Breast, Benign phyllodes tumour

This fibroepithelial lesion shows an unusual intraductal growth pattern, and mimics a rare entity, intraductal fibroadenomatosis. Intraductal fibroadenomatosis is described as having features of flbroadenomas, papillomas and phyllodes tumours. In this case, the stromal expansion (with focal leaf-like pattern) and stromal cellularity were too pronounced, and the stromal mitotic activity too high (up to 7/10 high power fields), for a diagnosis of fibroadenoma.

Reported cases of intraductal fibroadenomatosis have not featured elevated mitotic activity or stromal atypia (Chung, A.et al., Breast J 2009, 14:193-195; Cummings MC, et al., Virchows Arch 2010, 456:105-106). Although the mitotic activity is more elevated than expected for a benign phyllodes tumour, no other worrisome features are observed - the borders are non-infiltrative, and there is no high-grade cytologic atypia, necrosis, heterologous differentiation or overgrowth in the stromal component. No atypia is identified in the ductal component.

See Related Content for references:
1) Chung, A.et al., Breast J 2009, 14:193-195.
2) Cummings MC, et al., Virchows Arch 2010, 456:105-106

This fibroepithelial lesion shows an unusual intraductal growth pattern, and mimics a rare entity, intraductal fibroadenomatosis. Intraductal fibroadenomatosis is described as having features of flbroadenomas, papillomas and phyllodes tumours. In this case, the stromal expansion (with focal leaf-like pattern) and stromal cellularity were too pronounced, and the stromal mitotic activity too high (up to 7/10 high power fields), for a diagnosis of fibroadenoma.

Reported cases of intraductal fibroadenomatosis have not featured elevated mitotic activity or stromal atypia (Chung, A.et al., Breast J 2009, 14:193-195; Cummings MC, et al., Virchows Arch 2010, 456:105-106). Although the mitotic activity is more elevated than expected for a benign phyllodes tumour, no other worrisome features are observed - the borders are non-infiltrative, and there is no high-grade cytologic atypia, necrosis, heterologous differentiation or overgrowth in the stromal component. No atypia is identified in the ductal component.

See Related Content for references:
1) Chung, A.et al., Breast J 2009, 14:193-195.
2) Cummings MC, et al., Virchows Arch 2010, 456:105-106

This fibroepithelial lesion shows an unusual intraductal growth pattern, and mimics a rare entity, intraductal fibroadenomatosis. Intraductal fibroadenomatosis is described as having features of flbroadenomas, papillomas and phyllodes tumours. In this case, the stromal expansion (with focal leaf-like pattern) and stromal cellularity were too pronounced, and the stromal mitotic activity too high (up to 7/10 high power fields), for a diagnosis of fibroadenoma.

Reported cases of intraductal fibroadenomatosis have not featured elevated mitotic activity or stromal atypia (Chung, A.et al., Breast J 2009, 14:193-195; Cummings MC, et al., Virchows Arch 2010, 456:105-106). Although the mitotic activity is more elevated than expected for a benign phyllodes tumour, no other worrisome features are observed - the borders are non-infiltrative, and there is no high-grade cytologic atypia, necrosis, heterologous differentiation or overgrowth in the stromal component. No atypia is identified in the ductal component.

See Related Content for references:
1) Chung, A.et al., Breast J 2009, 14:193-195.
2) Cummings MC, et al., Virchows Arch 2010, 456:105-106